Ham Nani Sudhrenge! Mehbooba Mufti and other Kashmir leaders stand for other countries but not for Bharat; No solidarity shown ever with Kashmiri Pandits, the army, intelligence agencies, J&K Police, or CRPF

Ham Nani Sudhrenge! Mehbooba Mufti and other Kashmir leaders stand for other countries but not for Bharat; No solidarity shown ever with Kashmiri Pandits, the army, intelligence agencies, J&K Police, or CRPF

POONCH TODAY NEWS

POONCH/JAMMU: Does the nation need more proof of Kashmir-based questionable ideology against Bharat? Absolutely not, as the nation has been seeing this ideology for long.

The Kashmir-based ideological people, including the former chief minister Mehbooba Mufti, were never seen showing solidarity when Kashmiri Pandits were murdered, tortured and thrown out of the valley during the tenure of the late Mufti Sayeed as home minister of India. They never condemned terrorism but always pressurised the union government to have a dialogue with Pakistan because they all have an in-depth love for its ideological forces across the globe, like Pakistan and similar nations. They never stood with the army, intelligence agencies, J&K Police and CRPF personnel that sacrificed their lives for the nation while fighting terrorism. When the American forces left Afghanistan, these people praised Afghanistan and gave statements in favour of Pakistan and Afghanistan. After Uri, Pulwama and Pahalgam, in addition to the attacks of the 90s (against Kashmiri Pandits) and 2000s, they were in hibernation under the planned agenda of Pakistan and its ideological forces. During the last more than three decades of terrorism in J&K, this set of people never uttered a single statement against Pakistan for fomenting trouble in J&K. Although on humanitarian grounds, India has helped many nations, including Iran, Turkey, and Bangladesh, during their hours of crisis, these people have always shown their love for Pakistan and other countries that support terrorism, but they never stood with their own country, Bharat, because their ideology never permitted them to stand with the nation they are living in. Standing for Iran on humanitarian grounds is good being an Indian, but the question arises: why did the same set of people never stand with their own country, Bharat? A few days back, the former Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti candidly said that the people of Kashmir stand with Iran, and after his statement, people were seen donating for Iran. But the question arises: why were such attempts not made in favour of Kashmiri Pandits, in favour of security forces that became targets of terrorists during the last three decades of terrorism? It’s a clear indication that the agenda of these people always remained against the national interest, and it doesn’t matter even if the entire country stands with Kashmir in a positive way, but they will continue to implement their ideological agenda on the ground, which is purely against the national interest. Why was no such solidarity shown after the Pahalgam and all types of terrorist attacks from these political people over the years? Why were nationalist sentiments not allowed to flourish in Kashmir for several decades? Those who stand for other countries repeatedly were never seen even for a single time to stand with their own country, Bharat, to condemn Pakistan. They always glorified terrorists as freedom fighters but never stood with the nation and continued to play an anti-India role. But the other day, LG Manoj Sinha categorically said that the era of anti-nationals enjoying due to the patronage of Kashmir-based political parties is over and more anti-nationals will be dismissed from the government services in the near future. The way Mehboba Mufti and the people of Kashmir and their ideological forces across the J&K have stood up for other countries repeatedly, they never stood with Bharat during good and bad times over the decades, and it clearly shows their clear-cut agenda against the nation, which needs no further proof. After the people of Kashmir and their ideological supporters were seen donating to other countries, a social media user wrote, “Helping others is good. But they must stand for their own country first.” If the security forces are handling the members of the anti-national gangs strongly and repeatedly for their wrong acts, then these gangs have no right to label the sitting regime in a negative way because every anti-national deserves harsh treatment from the state because nothing is more important than the nation and the national interest.